Reasons I believe the Vickie Sorensen Allegations

I’ve seen a lot of attempts to whitewash the tragic death of a newborn during a birth that Vickie Sorensen attended at her free-standing birth center in Utah. The child was a twin that was born premature, two risk factors that should have excluded the patient from an out of hospital birth. The arguments the pro-vickie, pro-home birth camp put forward are pretty pathetic. It is the same garbage I hear every time a midwife is arrested. The first response is that no one is allowed to have an opinion on the validity of the charges until the verdict comes through (interestingly enough, every single case I’ve followed ended in a conviction).

Courts rightly presume innocence until guilt is proven, but regular people are under no such obligation when forming their opinions.

The first argument is “we don’t have all the facts yet”! But we do have the fact that the attorney general felt that there was enough evidence to base a manslaughter charge on. We have the fact that the Salt Lake Tribune felt comfortable enough with the findings of police and interviewing witnesses to run the story.

Another important thing to remember is that if ANY of these allegations are true then it was an appalling way to behave. I have a hard time believing that *none* of the allegations are true, and they do not all need to be true for this incident to serve as a wake up call to Utahans and our legislators.

There are other factors that lead me to believe that these charges are based on fact.

The sheer number of witnesses which would have to conspire against Vickie Sorensen (for no known reason) is pretty astronomical. I could accept one or perhaps maybe two witnesses testifying for some known reason against Vickie, but if you read the allegations it becomes clear that the minimum number of witnesses far exceeds reasonable doubt:

baby’s mother

baby’s father

baby’s grandmother

first EMT

second EMT

at least one doctor

at least one nurse


That is, at a minimum, seven people who witnessed the case at hand. I would imagine that if the testimonies were mixed there would be no case- the district attorney generally tries to avoid wasting time on cases that are not able to be prosecuted successfully. I find it much more likely that the accounts of 7 (or more) people corroborate the manslaughter charges.

Even if there was some attempt to persecute Vickie Sorensen for a reason not apparent at this time, there is the problem of the medical records. All the workers involved would have to falsify their records while the events were taking place or shortly after. I find this highly unlikely.

The other possibility I have been able to come up with is that police officers would have to tamper with the evidence, risking their career (again for no known reason). Since most of the evidence would probably be witness accounts and medical records it would be pretty difficult to fake, and would be found out rather quickly at trial. I find it unlikely.

The other major reason I find the allegations plausible is that this is exactly the same as every other home birth disaster. Anyone who follows them knows there is a theme. There are three phases to many home birth disasters:

First, the midwife makes a mistake.

Second, it becomes apparent that she doesn’t know what she is doing and real medical professionals are called.

Third, the midwife lies about her involvement in the delivery, or opts to lie to the hospital about her mistake.

Here is a collection of stories that fit the pattern:

Magnuss’s death (midwives told the mother breech birth was safe, the baby got stuck and brain damaged from oxygen deprivation, the midwife told EMTs they weren’t aware it was a breech birth until the delivery)

Shepphard’s injury (midwives told mother it was normal to labor for days, kept finding reasons not to show up to help the mother, baby was injured by days and days of labor and had to have extensive hospital stay to recover, midwives denied that any of this happened and threatened a lawsuit if the mother told anyone what happened)

A mother’s injuries (midwives told her to push and that she was crowning, when she was not fully dialated and had a blood clot coming out due to pelvic organ prolapse, midwife refused to give hospital any information about the birth, mother has injuries to her pelvic organs that are only fixable by surgery, baby was in distress but saved by c-section)

Sam’s death and mothers near death (midwife ignored signs of placental abruption, transported too late, baby had severe oxygen deprivation injuries and mother almost died from post partum bleeding. Midwife lied about her involvement to the board and blamed the physicians for her mistake. Sam died at 3 years old due to his brain injury.)

Mary Beth’s death (midwife didn’t show up for the birth on time, so EMTs were called. the midwife said everything was fine even though there were signs of respiratory distress. The baby died later that day, and the midwife falsified medical records to avoid arrest, as well as trying to convince Mary Beth’s mother that the death was not preventable)

Newborn baby birth injured, mother gets sepsis (breech baby had a brain bleed, mother had a fever after home birth delivery. Midwife told her not to go to the hospital, but things kept getting worse. The midwife asked the mother to sign a form that said the midwife did not attend the birth and begged her not to tell because she was concerned about her own license)

Aquila’s death (another placental abruption, mother begging for transfer that was denied, midwife put that patient refused transport on medical documents to try and avoid consequences, baby dies)

Lia’s death (midwife said twin birth after cesarean is safe, one twin is born not breathing and isn’t resuscitated, midwife denies that the baby could have been saved in hospital)

Gavin Michael’s death (a midwife lied to their patient about the safety of going past 43 weeks or pregnancy with a measurement of zero amniotic fluid, the baby died in utero from slow suffocation, the midwife lied about attending the birth in public and then in private blames the mother because they would have “hated” her if she had decided to be harsh about the emergency)

It is worth noting that in the last story, the midwife decided to ask other midwives what to do publicly on facebook instead of admitting that she really had no clue what she was doing. A parade of other clueless midwives, including Jan Tritten (editor of Midwifery Today, the trade magazine for direct entry midwives) all suggested that they either wait longer or take worthless remedies like stevia. None of them have taken any responsibility in the death despite being questioned about it relentlessly via facebook and email.

I decided to take 10 minutes to find these stories, there are many more out there. There are unknown stories, where the patient believed the midwive’s lies and decided not to seek disciplinary action as a result. This is normal for midwives.

As I have pointed out before, midwives have a handy guide to avoiding responsibility for deaths (called From Calling to Courtroom) which advocates Lying to hospitals, to patients, to police. I have also pointed out that the Utah Midwive’s Associations peer review guidelines encourage lying to conceal illegal behavior.

It is so predictable, it would be boring if it weren’t so tragic. The point of this is not to say that you can always believe a midwife is guitly, it is to demonstrate that this is by any standard a completely ordinary event. Ordinary events do not require extraordinary evidence in order to be believed by regular people. If I am wrong I will make as many retractions as needed, but I’m not holding my breath.



10 thoughts on “Reasons I believe the Vickie Sorensen Allegations

  1. Thank you for posting this. I live in Cedar City and I am appalled at the number of people rallying around this woman as if she did nothing wrong. I realize that she is entitled to a fair trial and I don’t take issue with that. But, the very people who claim that she is innocent, persecuted, etc. are quick to jump all over anyone who expresses concern that an innocent baby most likely died a preventable death. Doctors, teachers, nurses and many more are required to be licensed. Why not midwives???? Utah needs to get with the program. Women deserve MUCH better care than this.

  2. Pingback: unlicensed midwives and their dangerous practices | Safer Midwifery in Utah

  3. Pingback: Not even sorry | Safer Midwifery in Utah

  4. Have you ever thought to research how many babies die at Valley View Medical Center? You have no comparisons here, you are stating random reports without all the facts. How many babies are born healthy and happy at home? How many hundreds of thousands of dollars are saved by home deliveries? How many hospital patients contract infections while in the hospital? You must take into account that midwives go into the profession to help women. There is no path to wealth or fame. This is a profession of the heart. Everyone should have a choice of where they want to deliver their baby, and who their healthcare provider will be.

    • There are mandatory reporting protocols in place for hospitals. If the statistics deviate significantly, or if there is the event of an infant dying that was otherwise expected to live, an automatic chain of investigations is initiated. Nurses that murder patients (“angels of mercy” killers) are almost always caught by reporting protocols that require investigations into an inordinate number (or pattern) or deaths. Neat, huh? Too bad home birth midwives have no such system in place, and can simply move or change their name when they kill someone, while the other midwives protect her and ignore the grieving family.

      Valley View medical center, and hospitals generally, can be researched via the CDC wonder database. If you combine the database information and compare it to the MANA stats project (numbers provided by midwives themselves on a voluntary basis) the superior safety of hospital birth is quite clear. There is a 2-3 fold increase in perinatal mortality for out of hospital births that are low risk. The higher risk births, like breech, have their mortality stats soar as high as one in two hundred.

      Everyone should have a choice where they birth and who their provider should be, but in turn each provider needs to be insured in order to pay a family in case of injury or death. That is just being responsible.

  5. Having lived in Iron County, and watched the behavior of that PD, they are perfectly capable of pressuring people into falsifying testimony, and perjuring themselves, and falsifying reports. I would even go so far as to believe that it MAY be a regular practice for them. This Sorenson case was thrown out of the courts twice because it was so full of garbage, but certain doctors there who have always wanted to get rid of the midwives in town (I’ve seen them in action) kept pushing it from behind. There were several wrongful death cases with the county ambulance service that same year. This is a whitewash job for them. Now the Iron County ambulance service is going to be privatized because “there were quality concerns”. You don’t have a good midwife practicing for more than 20 years with no such concerns previously and then suddenly start acting like the inexperienced idiot that Bleak (who I have seen perjure himself) describes in his obviously false statement, which included the claim that Vickie probably had many more “victims” who wouldn’t come forward because they were polygamist. This claim was made after the decision in the Brown case which made polygamy legal and removed the fear of prosecution. Moreover, this was the same claim that the PD used in falsely charging me and my husband (monogamists) for child abuse, which charges were later dropped, not only because they were false, but because Bleak and Orton both perjured themselves trying to make the case stick, and I had written evidence of their perjury.

  6. I have nothing against midwifery but you need to be up to date on things and have the proper equipment to help newborns breath…. I feel that is a given. she was unlicensed and didn’t have proper tools to resesitate an infant.
    She lied to the parents of the mother of the twins. They were in the next room when all of this went down and were told that the mother was resting and everything was going to plan, and that they would call the hospital if they couldn’t stop the labor. which made them feel like the contractions had stopped or slowed and everything would be fine. After the first twin was born they called in the grandma (who used to work in the nicu) to help them to revive the very purple, not breathing first twin. After a few minutes of cpr, Camille called the ambulance.
    Then not to mention as the mother was trying to get in the ambulance vickie was trying to get the mother to come back into the birthing center to birth the second twin.
    This just disgusts me that they would even have her push when they were ill equipt to save a premature infant. Midwifes (in Utah at least) are not allowed to birth twins.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s